SUPREME AND DISTRICT COURTS CAIRNS
LAW LIST
Wednesday 5 March 2025


NOTICES
SUPREME COURT APPLICATION DAYS:14 MARCH 2025, 4 APRIL 2025, 30 MAY 2025, 20 JUNE 2025 and 11 JULY 2025.SUPREME COURT ADMISSIONS DATES:4 APRIL 2025 and 20 JUNE 2025. APPLICATION MORNINGS EACH WEDNESDAY AND FRIDAY SUPREME COURT IS SITTING IN CAIRNS. DISTRICT COURT APPLICATIONS DAYS WITH APPEALS & P & E: 7 MARCH 2025, 4 APRIL 2025, 2 MAY 2025 and 6 JUNE 2025.


JURY INFORMATION
Jurors who are currently empanelled on a trial are required for service today as directed by the Judge.

All other Panel D jurors should continue to check this message daily, and attend when your number is within the range called.


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT CRIMINAL SITTINGS

WRIGHT, Anthony CoulterJustice HenryCourt 1Level 49:00 AM 
(Sentence)
SINGH, RajwinderJustice HenryCourt 1Level 410:00 AM 
(Trial Part Heard)


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL SITTINGS

DRIEBERG, Clifford Harold MeaJudge RichardsCourt 3Level 49:00 AM 
(Sentence)
GURGONE, Aldo DamionJudge Morzone KCCourt 4Level 39:00 AM 
(Mention – Appearance and Legal Representatives Required)
YEATMAN, Lindsay Shane AnthonyJudge Morzone KCCourt 4Level 39:00 AM 
(Mention – Appearance and Legal Representatives Required)
ACCOOM; BEATTIE; BOWEN; COOPER; DAVIS; FINLAY; GARDINER; GRANT; HAY; HARPER; HODGES; KANDAKASI; KINGSBURRA; LAZA; LIN; MURRAY; NEIGHAL; NORMAN; O’CONNOR; PAMTOONDA; QUEALY; RYAN; SALT; SOLOMON; STAFFORD; THOMAS; YOUNG; COOKJudge Morzone KCCourt 4Level 39:00 AM 
(Indictment Presentation – Legal Representatives Required)
CRAIG, Clayton RobertJudge FantinCourt 2Level 49:00 AM 
(Re-Opening of Sentence – Appearance and Legal Representatives Required)
NICHOLLS, Frederick StanleyJudge Treviño KCCourt 2Level 42:00 PM 
(Pre-Recording of Evidence – Appearance and Legal Representatives Required)


Disclaimer
Every effort has been made to comply with non-publication (suppression) orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this information. The onus remains on any person using material from court files to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision.